July 22, 2008

The Dead Ends Don’t Justify the Means

Last year, I noted how the Topeka and Shawnee County Pub­lic Library and oth­ers ana­lyzed the user expe­ri­ence in the cat­a­log and began using Mee­boMe as a way to pro­vide a path out of the “no results” dead end. Now we have another great exam­ple from the Allen County Pub­lic Library of re-examining dead ends in the catalog

Hi-Tech Hi-Touch: A Sirsi Patron Mate­r­ial Request Form

The point of need that inter­ested me was to make a mate­r­ial request form avail­able for the patron when they could not find their search item.…

The real meat of the pro­cess­ing is han­dled by the findit.php code. This is a reen­trant form that does all the val­i­da­tion and pro­cess­ing. If you would like a copy of the code just email and I will send it to you.” [ACPL’s Inno­va­tion through Tech­nol­ogy]

ACPL purchase request form in the catalog

So basi­cally, Sean Robin­son at ACPL added a pur­chase request form to the search results page of the cat­a­log so that if the Library doesn’t own the title the patron is look­ing for, she can imme­di­ately sub­mit a pur­chase request. It’s these seem­ingly minor improve­ments that pro­vide a more robust ser­vice in a place patrons don’t nor­mally find a librar­ian. Why our ven­dors can’t think of these things is beyond me, but it’s great to see librar­i­ans like Sean tak­ing the ini­tia­tive to imple­ment them.

Share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Ping.fm
  • Tumblr
  • Diigo
  • email
  • FriendFeed
  • PDF
  • Posterous
  • Twitter

9:53 pm Comments (8)

8 Comments »

  1. Some­times the sim­ple ideas are the best ones!

    Comment by Crystal — July 23, 2008 @ 7:14 am

  2. Why our ven­dors can’t think of these things is beyond me”

    Indeed.

    Comment by Mike — July 23, 2008 @ 7:47 am

  3. ACPLs think alike. The inabil­ity to cus­tomize the search results page in just the same way was one of the many nag­ging frus­tra­tions that led us to switch to Koha.

    Comment by Owen — July 23, 2008 @ 8:21 am

  4. Our rather out­dated Sirsi/Dynix Web 2 OPAC does offer this abiltt with an auto­mat­i­cally filled in patron iden­ti­fi­ca­tion form (as long as they are signed in) so we can inform the patron and place hold when the item is purchased…

    Comment by Mick — July 23, 2008 @ 2:31 pm

  5. Thanks for post­ing this, Jenny. Sean worked very hard on this and it has had great results.

    Comment by Melissa Kiser — July 23, 2008 @ 2:57 pm

  6. […] The Dead Ends Don’t Jus­tify the Means — “So basi­cally, Sean Robin­son at ACPL added a pur­chase request form to the search results page of the cat­a­log so that if the Library doesn’t own the title the patron is look­ing for, she can imme­di­ately sub­mit a pur­chase request.” […]

    Pingback by Friday Link Round Up « ellie <3 libraries — July 25, 2008 @ 8:11 am

  7. So… these libraries actu­ally have enough money to be able to fill those user-generated pur­chase requests? And the libraries auto­mat­i­cally pur­chase based on indi­vid­ual user demand? Does this mean that an indi­vid­ual user could skew col­lec­tion con­tents by gen­er­at­ing a lot of requests?

    Comment by Ilene Frank — August 1, 2008 @ 8:32 am

  8. Ilene, I think this is prob­a­bly like the pur­chase request form on any library site — it just hap­pens to be linked to from the “no results” page. I’m sure that the same guide­lines apply as when some­one stops at the circ desk and requests that the library pur­chase a book they couldn’t find on the shelf.

    The key here is that ACPL has taken a ser­vice that is usu­ally buried on a web­site, away from the cat­a­log or only linked to from the home page or a help page, and sur­faced it in a use­ful place. The ser­vice itself is still the same, and it now par­al­lels the one that hap­pens in the phys­i­cal build­ing in a more usable way.

    Comment by jenny — August 1, 2008 @ 8:42 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. | TrackBack URI

Leave a comment